On 9 July 2014 11:44, Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com> wrote: > On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:28:27], Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 9 July 2014 05:25, Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > Juan is away for a couple of weeks. This looks like a good fix to >> > pull in for 2.1, though. Peter, do you agree? Can you pick this up >> > if so? >> >> What's the bug it's fixing? I had a look at the commit message, >> but that suggests it's just tightening up sanity checking, not >> fixing an actual issue... Maybe you can clarify. > > Right, it improves correctness: after this patch, we ensure a rogue or > corrupt migration stream cannot cause problems on the dest.
OK; we're treating those as bugs so yes, I think this is 2.1 material. Has somebody other than the original author tested it? (That's a step that would usually be done by Juan as the maintainer.) If somebody can provide a Tested-by: I'm happy to apply it to master. thanks -- PMM
