Hi,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:37:18 +0300, marcel.apfelb...@gmail.com wrote:
> BTW, did you notice a bug here? If yes, can you elaborate?
No, not a direct bug.
We noticed this while working on related code areas.
There's some history behind this.
In 95d6580 'msi: Invoke msi/msix_write_config from PCI core', the calls
to msi[x]_write_config have been added into pci_default_write_config,
and many specialized 'config_write' methods have been eliminated.
However there was a bug in 95d6580 - the values written to msi/msix
were always 0.
This was recently fixed in d7efb7e
'pci: avoid losing config updates to MSI/MSIX cap regs'
I assume that device authors were either (1) unware of the
generalization, thus kept invoking msi[x]_write_config explicitly, or
(2) trying to overcome the "lost writes".
Anyway, I'm no PCI expert here, but I assume the side-effect invoking
msi[x]_write_config twice (explicitly from the specialized config_write,
then implicitly from pci_default_write_config) isn't desired.
Meaning, the suggested patch follows the spirit of 95d6580.
Let me know if my analysis is flawed.
Regards,
Shmulik
