* Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2017-10-17 18:19:20 +0200]:
[...] > >> Testing > >> ======= > >> > >> Nothing happened since v2 except for a quick smoke test. Dong Jia gave v2 > >> a spin with a focus on vfio-ccw. @Dong Jia I would appreciate some proper > >> testing, especially regarding the changes in vfio-ccw (patch #3). > > > > Looks sane to me (if needed, I can fix up the minor things I found). > > > > In addition to some testing, I'd appreciate some review from others as > > well. > > > > Of course, I'm fine with the fixes (won't answer individually). I think > both Dong Jia and Pierre have already put enough work in this to be credited > with a tag, so I really hope they will get around to review this. I would > be especially happy with an Tested-by: Dong Jia since this series is quite > under-tested, and the changes in vfio-ccw aren't just minor. > > Of course I could come up with a test setup myself, but I hope Dong Jia > already has one, and he is certainly more involved with vfio-ccw. > Using Conny's s390-next branch + this series (#2-#7), I didn't notice any obvious problem during my fio test. So for the vfio-ccw related part: Tested-by: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [...] -- Dong Jia Shi
