On 03/14/11 17:40, Alon Levy wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 04:20:22PM +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > ok, here is a note where I kinda ignored my own wishes but I want > to be very clear on them: > libcacard should not be part of qemu. > it is here because I once thought it would speed things up. > > So I'm not taking it out or anything - it's fine with me that it > goes into qemu, just as long as it's understood that I'm now maintaining > another copy of it for usage outside of qemu, in the spice client (or > any other client for that matter - it will be the same when we do vnc > support for this).
Hi Alon, This bit is somewhat problematic. If QEMU is maintaining a copy of libcacard, then that has to comply with the QEMU way of doing things. QEMU cannot rely on various portions in the tree behaving in different ways. Otherwise it really should be an external library requirement pulled in by the build. I am not sure what is the best way, if it stays in QEMU people will eventually start making modifications to it, without looking at the other copy that is being maintained. Alternatively the external apps that build against it should be taught to link with the QEMU version. Cheers, Jes
