On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 06:21, Klaus Jensen <i...@irrelevant.dk> wrote: > > From: Klaus Jensen <k.jen...@samsung.com> > > Commit 1901b4967c3f changed the nvme device from using a bar exclusive > for MSI-x to sharing it on bar0. > > Unfortunately, the msix_uninit_exclusive_bar() call remains in > nvme_exit() which causes havoc when the device is removed with, say, > device_del. Fix this. > > Additionally, a subregion is added but it is not removed on exit which > causes a reference to linger and the drive to never be unlocked. > > Fixes: 1901b4967c3f ("hw/block/nvme: move msix table and pba to BAR 0") > Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jen...@samsung.com> > --- > hw/block/nvme.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c > index 624a1431d072..5fe082ec34c5 100644 > --- a/hw/block/nvme.c > +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c > @@ -6235,7 +6235,8 @@ static void nvme_exit(PCIDevice *pci_dev) > if (n->pmr.dev) { > host_memory_backend_set_mapped(n->pmr.dev, false); > } > - msix_uninit_exclusive_bar(pci_dev); > + msix_uninit(pci_dev, &n->bar0, &n->bar0); > + memory_region_del_subregion(&n->bar0, &n->iomem); > } > > static Property nvme_props[] = {
Looks plausible, but if you want this in rc5 could somebody review it, please ? thanks -- PMM