Organizations that incur a large mail stream, shouldn't be relying on a
slow, unstable connection. If they are trapped with this kind of
connectivity, POP3 and IMAP accounts on a remote mail server was the option
I was referring to- for the simple fact that mail server administration
would be hell under such bandwidth squeeze.
Mike Ventimiglia
Ultracom Internet Technologies
-----Original Message-----
From: Pashinin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 9:11 PM
To: Mike Ventimiglia
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: methods for ETRN
As I think, POP3 or IMAP accounts is the best way for users,
but not for organizations.
Besides, why POP3 better SMTP for feeding large mail stream over
unstable, slow connection ?
Mike Ventimiglia wrote:
>
> I think he is referring to a solution such as POP3, or IMAP accounting.
> Which would be the most viable option in the absence of a stable,
always-on
> internet connection.
>
> Mike Ventimiglia
> Ultracom Internet Technologies
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pashinin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 8:42 PM
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: methods for ETRN
>
> Recommend, please, protocol instead SMTP in such case.
--
Pashinin:OL
