Yes, that's it! Well spotted (and maybe new glasses for me ...).
Thanks! Andy's solution now also works beautifully.
Ted.
On 05-Sep-03 Andrew C. Ward wrote:
> I wonder if it's as simple as the two dots ("..") in the
> splom line rather than three?
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrew C. Ward
>> However, there seems to be a problem with Andy Liaw's,
>> applied to the same data:
>>
>> df.trans <- lapply(DF, function(x) log(1+x)) ## Do the
>> transformation.
>> splom(df.trans, panel = function(x, y, ..) {
>> panel.xyplot(x, y, ...)
>> fit <- lm(log(exp(y)-1) ~ log(exp(x)-1), subset =
>> x>0 & y>0)
>> panel.abline(fit)
>> })
>>
>> Error in panel(x = as.numeric(z[subscripts, j]),
>> y = as.numeric(z[subscripts, :
>> ... used in an incorrect context
>>
>> (which is the same error as I got trying an earlier
>> suggestion of Deepayan's).
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 05-Sep-03 Time: 11:49:06
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
