The result you got is the same as for a variogram model from vgm with a
nugget effect. This is the ratio of anisotropy, which is one both for
the nugget and for the correlated part of the model. See:
str(vgm(10, "Exp", 300))
str(vgm(10, "Exp", 300, 3))
I guess you see something like the second one as autofitVariogram is not
able to fit the anisotropy parameters. For that you could have a look at
estimateParameters in the intamap package, which can fit a variogram
model of the vgm-type with anisotropy parameters.
Cheers,
Jon
On 7/29/2014 6:56 PM, Hodgess, Erin wrote:
Hello again!
I was using autoKrige (finally successfully!) and was looking at the model
results. I got anis1 of 1,1 and anis2 of 1,1.
How does this relate to the anis in the vgm function, please?
Thanks,
Erin
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
