Hi Manuel,
If I am only allowed 16,000 columns then 700 tables times 130 columns in
each table = 91,000 columns.
Thanks for your help,
Mike
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:47:33 -0700, Manuel de Aguiar wrote:
>Hi Mike,
>I am just curious. If each table can have up to 400 columns and you can
have up to
>16,000 tables or views, why do you feel that attaching DBase files will be a
better
>route. Your requirement of 700 tables and 130 columns each fall
comfortably within
>RBase's specifications. Also I am not sure if an attached DBase file count
as a table
>under RBase.
>
>Curious,
>Manuel
>
>Michael Young wrote:
>
>> Thanks Manuel and Castanaro,
>>
>> Looks like I will probably end up going the DBASE route.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Mike Young
>>
>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:21:39 -0700, Manuel de Aguiar wrote:
>>
>> >Hello Mike,
>> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >Tables/Views/Columns/Rows
>> >
>> >Create up to 16,000 tables or views
>> >Create up to 16,000 columns
>> >Create up to 400 columns (fields) per table or view
>> >Maximum row (record) lengths of 4096 bytes
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >I found this information at:
>> > http://rbase2000.com/Products/rbase.htm
>> >Hope this helps,
>> >Manuel
>> >
>> >Michael Young wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> Does anybody know the limits in terms of number of tables and
columns
>> that
>> >> are allowed in RBWIN 6.5++?
>> >>
>> >> I am looking at developing a database with approximately 700 tables
and
>> around
>> >> 130 columns in each table.
>> >>
>> >> I realize that I may need to use multiple databases but I have another
>> option and
>> >> that would be to create DBASE tables since there really is no
relationship
>> >> between most of the tables and I can just attach them as needed. Does
>> anyone
>> >> know the speed or other drawbacks to keeping data in a DBASE file?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Mike Young
>> >
>
