I assume you are saying to convert all catenated tokens such as 100F to 100,F? That would be real nasty, requiring knowledge of where catenated tokens exist, as well as all possible catenated tokens. It could be done if I parsed the grammar to pull that information out, but that doesn't seem like a very good thing.
The reason why I have tokens such as 100F is for readability of the protocol. Why subvert the protocol for the sake of the parser? > Why not preprocess the input and make it consistent (insert or remove > the skip ',' character, but be consistent about it)? Or are you > determined to do it 100% in P::RD? :) > > Ted >
