The AAP report is partially right.

The decision which you can find at 
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/federal_ct/2000/191.html was 
split 2-1 with the majority (Von Dousa and Beaumont) accepting that 
Native Title amounted to a "bundle of rights" which could be divided. 
In some situations leases of various kinds result in complete 
extinguishment. In others the extinguishment is only partial.

The minority judge, North, refused the government appeals entirely, 
arguing that Native Title was not something that is divisible, but 
provides something amounting to title to land which cannot be so 
simply overturned.

Interestingly all three judges upheld Lee's treatment of the evidence 
concerning traditional connection which, amongst other things, 
recognised that there is no requirement to make use of a narrow test 
of biological decent which specifically relates each current claimant 
to those present at the declaration of sovereignty. This is likely to 
be an important issue in other cases.

A quick glance at the judgement, and the recognition by the judges 
concerned that some of the important principles involved have not yet 
been tested in the high court, suggests that a further appeal is 
likely.

Cheers

Rod
-- 
Rod Hagen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hurstbridge, Victoria, Australia
WWW    http://www.netspace.net.au/~rodhagen
-------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ 
http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/

Reply via email to