On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:02:31AM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote: [...] > explicitly allows for GPL'd software to be sold. But "free speech" > definitely implies that it can't be "bootlegged", even if it is sold > otherwise. [...]
Point well taken. Of course you're right. However, my main concern is that people keep equalling "GPL" with "at no kost" - that's what I was aiming at. The (in)famous "free speech" vs. "free beer" thingy... :-) Cheerio, Thomas -- ==> RH List Archive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=redhat-list&r=1&w=2 <== ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas Ribbrock http://www.ribbrock.org "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!" -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list