Marc,
Precedence has been set in JSON Values Registry of RFC 9083 with the “notice
and remark type” to support an enumerated set of notices and remarks with the
use of the “type” field. If a similar approach was taken for the reason in
draft-gould-regext-rdap-redacted, the reason member would need to be
restructured in a similar fashion to the “notices” and “remarks” in RFC 9083.
Meaning make it a JSON object with a optional “description” member and an
optional “type” member, where the “type” member will match the registered type
in the JSON Values Registry. We would then need to add a new JSON Values
Registry type for redaction reasons to enable the registration of them. I
recommend adding the JSON Values Registry type “redaction reason” for this
purpose. The optional “reason” member would then look like the following:
# Reason with an unregistered description
"reason" :
{
“description” : “Client request”
}
# Reason with only a registered type
“reason” :
{
“type” : “Client request"
}
# Reason with both a registered type and a description
“reason” :
{
“type” : “Client request"
“description” : “Client requested to have the field redacted”
}
Does this look consistent with the approach taken in RFC 9083 and address your
feedback?
Thanks,
--
JG
[cid:image001.png@01D77892.4893C0C0]
James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgo...@verisign.com>
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/>
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca>
Date: Monday, July 12, 2021 at 7:41 AM
To: James Gould <jgo...@verisign.com>
Cc: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] New Version Notification for
draft-gould-regext-rdap-redacted-00.txt
Le 12 juill. 2021 à 07:26, Gould, James
<jgo...@verisign.com<mailto:jgo...@verisign.com>> a écrit :
- I really would like to have an IANA registry for the « reason » property.
Because this would be potentially displayed to the user, and to avoid having
all variations of the same reason in different words. A registry of reserved
words would also facilitate translation in multiple languages.
We had a desire to stay away from needing to setup an IANA registry for
redaction. I view the reason property as not a good candidate for an IANA
registry, since it's meant to be a human readable informational value
Fine but that does not preclude the use of an IANA registry with reserved text.
We already have that:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/rdap-json-values/rdap-json-values.xhtml<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1CpBTBaAbWXShtu3I3CgJpJu24mEs9ljN-JZFzuDsQTI3FxgaWMmOrd_t3tvEV72gkQmb5znPpgnRyT4kmZRJDIqFHqcz9Bbyvg57xwiJfZd-N4xqddAw5eLmk_K28myevtwarkxyyRc3Nrd_Hv17G7Ps-CwKFwcGPyigFJVrP1aZw9RCvarhO-h-GExrL1MsE7pkowpYOR3h_QrlwfnEBqhicohhvS7BpAyyBnWL6VIuEMdEN5HFDNJ_DAAljli3/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Frdap-json-values%2Frdap-json-values.xhtml>.
We can even reuse the same registry and add some rows. Client processing,
with reserved words, can act upon: displaying nice icons instead of long words
for example. It can also be internationalized. If it is human readable, then
that means the server has to send all the languages translations. Not great.
I’m sure that we can standardized those reason values to less than a dozen.
Marc.
that includes normative language not to be used as a client processing
dependency. This is a good discussion item.
Thanks,
--
JG
James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com<mailto:jgo...@verisign.com>
<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgo...@verisign.com>
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
Verisign.com<http://Verisign.com>
<http://verisigninc.com/<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1beQfCbdiRGkXWoDIwEZqB-syrWkxKlPLmKXZ5TyPLcyHJefT1L0kWFy55Ogjue3I0e6sl1LZnrl57ZdbPW70plJDkV1TrXSRiOVelUFiAdeskppvN7dLYDFaa0F4fRnqlN0gf6aXzFlIMbtj7PYNnyai6PheZ2iizECnbbRgkFOPor0IF9oPIALohtLm2Ur5hdrKFF3RqLFts6IzaW8svDPPDK_pHe6KQjPjK63W-Cx_D5Xb_GShrkpr4QQRNZyb/http%3A%2F%2Fverisigninc.com%2F>>
On 7/12/21, 7:15 AM, "Marc Blanchet"
<marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca<mailto:marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca>> wrote:
Just read it. Goooood. We need it. (Specially with my hat of RDAP client
app).
Some early comments:
- would be good to include specific text about jscontact, so when we switch
to it, this document does not need rev.
- I really would like to have an IANA registry for the « reason » property.
Because this would be potentially displayed to the user, and to avoid having
all variations of the same reason in different words. A registry of reserved
words would also facilitate translation in multiple languages.
Really would like this document to move forward. As RDAP client implementor,
I would like to implement it. If some servers are already implementing it,
please contact me directly so we can do some interop testing.
Marc.
Le 12 juill. 2021 à 07:02, Gould, James
<jgould=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:jgould=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org>>
a écrit :
The "Redacted Fields in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Response"
draft-gould-regext-rdap-redacted has been published. The goal of the draft is
to describe an RDAP extension for explicitly identifying redacted RDAP response
fields, using JSONPath as the default expression language. Any review and
feedback is welcome.
Thanks,
--
JG
James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com<mailto:jgo...@verisign.com>
<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgo...@verisign.com>
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
Verisign.com<http://Verisign.com>
<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1mjljSszRHMWBBWiVRrUMrhOUeWm_mQQZEornOV0IrqHX9vEnx-RCoWBk3Zda8WqCNRU2NgrG-u3RKtOxjaTIW2NQLrnU8qmJM0TdYVjnXN4tq91ifewAp8_CuiyCLw6D7pv86v_tMUzLbq-kK-UEKMjw1YjiruuDEgLNYp1REtcP41bcKqFQ78Vfk0NDCZffn1KMxVw3qsSCX0lghUob_fR3sL9B3rSsac77K29Rvaq_6-YuWGw8mpL_8Gsf5msC/http%3A%2F%2Fverisigninc.com%2F>
On 7/12/21, 6:47 AM,
"internet-dra...@ietf.org<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>"
<internet-dra...@ietf.org<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>> wrote:
A new version of I-D, draft-gould-regext-rdap-redacted-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by James Gould and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-gould-regext-rdap-redacted
Revision: 00
Title: Redacted Fields in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)
Response
Document date: 2021-07-12
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 24
URL:
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1K328CySVpeAdQz8KNkRu7ncZhdPUaP8fTNul1LMbiFUNsZqIiaoBcPF_OjIj35fkwT9gDpIgI0UtjP0gvmatvP7d36VCx0jJYMqBEmzxelQ-PIg05Xfql3NqrTwSL4Q0rFMFYnngRChk0aHwtRt906uYqS23NjDteP_jrqxZQGqLQKBOv5Vgb43XRE8Ihgi27Ri4OozGV8C0GXEqGrZ7b95LpT-V-dDS3cIXEQUtIo-eTKJ-ZWGQKtVrYCNA9LBg/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Farchive%2Fid%2Fdraft-gould-regext-rdap-redacted-00.txt
Status:
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1XGKSPZDnB5CHFRYeBm5qN0ACnFvTe1ZG2O2llFvSrZi7q2nOKGpyNnv6E_m3_MO7ccF7VFbViZPAwR4-AhBS-dsgLlgR1UWs2nad61Rru2hB4B4t9trR3YvtBbMbIodX7jHHjrS9fI-dpAMLzEEana8BOyRiZ39Ri-bvZ5UE_IFT9l3WqspNfRqWS9oSUFqY-vVM_ewYcTLOwSxMvY7FXlWt6BqjHa2qdBNgIIZeu7bRKJ5BQ06B4AIe9y0IyRKd/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-gould-regext-rdap-redacted
Html:
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1B_5eD2QiPrj83T06F7L4QtU3TiyBUmvF_j2dCXin9B7g8aMHESwA458zvkfsNCSZ3H37ObhlCl4HDgTiq7FCk0m7tAWuFQNAMEz0gzbNML-5hfGMJS-SZMuc6OuAnS8mkBUX_yXOBGkWsB1aiFk9UNolX6_o5zxWepxXz9nn-00BrxxTi1kyaRTiPZNpjLbdBMA2T4pNfhbpIfvRnlq-ewNw77MmMocKIy0Out4Cqwdx_6T6yGu-QwVjoPehH4Pt/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Farchive%2Fid%2Fdraft-gould-regext-rdap-redacted-00.html
Htmlized:
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1p7JRanlgcayeNYcfSxig8HPTMLyO10UtuXnj8prHHxr5LSwZTK_a-LVs8jabLArSP8K_rmlxZ1UXoHYVMmGFjCculzG_bqoCTMIdWMI3hZ2nNAgnlOeQ9Py-vf3Jw_R533LAJqInMLvnEvhSaQlcJWdR7ttfJNgVhe04-dcLQt5GX8eCG-_W4P8LLeD1v8jcEH0CxWlSoiZ1Mfo-4sI5sOAnym_uiUApuKbmHO5njJY85ABtWiPCmHlxlVZghFOL/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-gould-regext-rdap-redacted
Abstract:
This document describes an RDAP extension for explicitly identifying
redacted RDAP response fields, using JSONPath as the default
expression language.
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>
https://secure-web.cisco.com/16CgORZ2fFT66iHVzi7kyPw6Mv9G4kbF2Mgjac7T3eRZU23t5cU1UejDzEN_N3uECtWwJmmdzTr2tME-2vLucgYzZURc3yY1pPZhyd2OA6EY1f6pWeTEY0LdnOjA4EUtLZsfr7Smu9GrMZbxiX5T10srKCMu0VsIZMNNswinhqo37gohlXQnOq_S3LmiXJlIt3gFaIYPid2NMKMibEzU_dtV-3t1v4BgghjRXsqsJQlv9cZq6k-Txw_wXVf2ekDS0/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
