Dear Antoin, If everything is fine, the -07 version will be published with the only change - namespace version will be 1.0
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:59 PM Antoin Verschuren <ietf= 40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > And with this, this WGLC is now formally closed. > The chairs count enough support for this draft (+6 not counting document > authors and shepherds) to be able to declare consensus. > > However, this draft changed from version 04 to version 06 during WGLC, and > we need a confirmation from the document shepherd in his review that only > editorial and no substantive changes were made, and all concerns during > WGLC are addressed in version 06. > Protocol dictates us that when substantive changes were made to a document > during WGLC, we need to issue a second WGLC before we can declare consensus > and submit it to the IESG. > > The document shepherd for this document is Jody Kolker. > Jody, when you have done your review, please let us know the result. > When there were no substantive changes during WGLC, you can start the > shepherd writeup for version 06. > > Regards, > > Jim and Antoin > > > > > > > Op 23 dec. 2021, om 12:05 heeft Dmitry Belyavsky <beld...@gmail.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > Dear Scott, > > Many thanks for your nitpicking! > I've addressed your concern about Section 6 using your words, many thanks! > > As for the namespace version, as James wrote before, we are going to > update it after the WGLC. > > Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 5:15 PM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck= > 40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> >> >> *From:* regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Antoin Verschuren >> *Sent:* Monday, December 20, 2021 8:55 AM >> *To:* regext@ietf.org >> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: >> draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04 >> >> >> >> *Caution:* This email originated from outside the organization. Do not >> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know >> the content is safe. >> >> Dear WG, >> >> >> >> This WGLC will end tonight, and so far we only have 2 explicit voices of >> support. >> >> This is a bit low to declare consensus. Could more people voice their >> support? >> >> Scott, can you confirm that the changes in version 05 address your >> initial concerns? >> >> *[SAH] Not yet fixed completely:* >> >> >> >> *Section 6 still doesn’t explain why “Registries SHOULD validate the >> domain names syntax in the provided email addresses”. I suggested this text >> in an earlier note:* >> >> >> >> *"Registries SHOULD ensure that the provided email addresses are >> syntactically valid to reduce the risk of future usability errors."* >> >> >> >> *The IANA Considerations section still uses “eai-0.3”. It should be >> “eai-1.0”.* >> >> >> >> *Scott* >> _______________________________________________ >> regext mailing list >> regext@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext >> > > > -- > SY, Dmitry Belyavsky > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > -- SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
