Heiner,

That is a known viewpoint. But the point of my message was to
ask for specific comments on and contributions to the draft.

    Brian

On 2008-10-24 23:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  
> Renumbering is impractical.This I can imagine and most of the  
> RRG-mailinglist members do know it best (i.e much better than me).
> Furthermore: It doesn't help wrt the IPv4 address depletion  issue. 
> Whereas ID plus LOCATION would. Admitted, this can be attributed to LISP,  
> too. But LISP doesn't exploit its own potential when it introduces a new name 
>  
> space but re-uses hereby the old one again (which is chaotic from the routing 
>  
> point of view).
>  
> Heiner 
>  
> In einer eMail vom 23.10.2008 22:43:52 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> 
> Hi
> Ran and I drafted this in reaction to the earlier discussion  here
> about the impracticality of renumbering. We'd like comments and,  above
> all, contributions. For now, this list is suggested for any  discussion,
> but I will also mention the draft on the intarea  list.
> 
> Brian
> 
> -------- Original Message  --------
> Subject: I-D  Action:draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-00.txt
> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008  13:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> A New  Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts  
> directories.
> 
> Title         : Renumbering still needs work
> Author(s)   : B. Carpenter, R. Atkinson
> Filename        :  draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-00.txt
> Pages     : 18
> Date       : 2008-10-23
> 
> This document reviews the existing  mechanisms for site renumbering
> for both IPv4 and IPv6, and identifies  operational issues with those
> mechanisms.  It also summarises current  technical proposals for
> additional mechanisms.  Finally there is a gap  analysis.
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft  is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-00.txt
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rrg  mailing  list
> [email protected]
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to