uh huh; some stray thoughts on this I-D
s.9
MITRE has approved this document for Public Release, Distribution
Unlimited, with Public Release Case Number 19-3027.
Is this the beginnings of an IPR issue to be resolved? I don't know.
YANG Model for QoS
QoS is a very general concept for me, seeeing it more in the context of
system and application performance rather than just network so I would
like something in the title to make it clear that this is 'only'
routing; ditto - especially - the Abstract. Current RFC have something
in the title that makes this clear.
s.1
(NMDA) [RFC8342 [RFC8342]].
looks odd with [[ ]]
YANG has conditionals which many modellers overuse (IMHO:-)
Here I would like more. You twice have min and max and so could require
that max> or >= min. Is it valid to have the one value, ie min = max,
or just a min?
contact (times seven)
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/rtgwg/>
WG List: <mailto:[email protected]>
WG Chair: Chris Bowers
<mailto:[email protected]>
WG Chair: Jeff Tantsura
<mailto:[email protected]>
should not have the WG chair therein- they are too ephemeral ! - just
web, list, editors
There is a mismatch between the editors of the I-D and those of the YANG
modules; is this intended?
References in the YANG module - I would like more! e.g.
identity one-rate-two-color-meter-type {
base meter-type;
description
"one rate two color meter type";
}
identity one-rate-tri-color-meter-type { ...
reference "RFC2697: A Single Rate Three Color Marker";
identity two-rate-tri-color-meter-type { ...
reference "RFC2698: A Two Rate Three Color Marker";
while some modules lack any such references for the identity; needs to
be consistent
or, still on Reference,
grouping protocol-cfg {
list protocol-cfg { key "protocol-min protocol-max";
description "list of ranges of protocol values";
which I read as being IPv4 only - IPv6 does not have protocol! Perhaps
a name change or explanatory note plus a reference to the IANA website.
choice drop-algorithm {
has only one case; if intended, an explanatory note would be useful
augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" {
is unqualified so this will be added to all interfaces in the box; I am
unclear if this is a good idea.
IANA !
Security !
s.A.1
"RFC 6020: YANG - A Data Modeling Language ...
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 11:26 PM
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-00.txt
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of the
IETF.
>
> Title : YANG Model for QoS
> Authors : Aseem Choudhary
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> Norm Strahle
> Ebben Aries
> Ing-Wher Chen
> Filename : draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-00.txt
> Pages : 89
> Date : 2019-10-07
>
> Abstract:
> This document describes a YANG model for Quality of Service (QoS)
> configuration and operational parameters.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-00
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-00
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
