Michael, I meant to say that APN is useful in those "Closed Loop Networks", which are becoming more common for the 5G enabled special services.
The "end user" or services that need APN are the one who have special contracts with the operators. Not all services. Linda Dunbar -----Original Message----- From: Apn <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 1:56 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Apn] why it is necessary to differentiate the security concern for 5G Vertical Networks from the grand Internet ( was RE: Application-Aware Networking (APN) focused interim Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> wrote: > There is no point convincing you of the 5G value. But one thing for > sure, there are a lot of 5G enabled vertical services powered by > specialized closed loop networks. Netflex is not one of them. You've missed the point. This wasn't about whether 5G was good or bad. It was about use cases for APN. (ps: I learnt nothing about 5G from the videos. I actually know a great deal about it. I don't believe even the moderate claims will come true, for the reasons I wrote about: lack of a trust model between end user and operator. I think that operators will be seriously disappointed) Two of the examples you gave me for *APN* (+ 5G) involve the public, using devices they own, accessing high-end sports across a public network. You've told me that this isn't the use case for APN, so why did I watch these videos? One example you gave me compared *4G* (3GPP) against 5G for shot-tracking stuff. Not being a basketball coach, I have really no idea what the effect of latency is on that. But, again, I don't know how APN fits into this. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
