Hi Folks, According to the feedback, we updates the draft. The updates are as follows: 1. For home broadband scenario, the figure is changed. The RG is connected to AN (access network), then the metro network. 2. For mobile broadband scenario, since the scope the APN attribute is encapsulated with the GTP-u tunnel is not in IETF, we remove the part. And the figure is also changed. The APN domain is confined to the mobile transport network.
Accordingly the following draft is also updated. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peng-apn-security-privacy-consideration-02.txt We updated the drafts according to the apparent issues. We will go on to refine the draft. Your comments are always welcome. Best Regards, Robin -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 11:42 AM To: Chongfeng Xie <[email protected]>; Dan Voyer <[email protected]>; Daniel Voyer <[email protected]>; Gyan Mishra <[email protected]>; j00406941 <[email protected]>; j00406941 <[email protected]>; Kentaro Ebisawa <[email protected]>; Peng Liu <[email protected]>; Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <[email protected]>; Stefano Previdi <[email protected]>; Lizhenbin <[email protected]>; Zhuangzhuang Qin <[email protected]> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-apn-problem-statement-usecases-04.txt A new version of I-D, draft-li-apn-problem-statement-usecases-04.txt has been successfully submitted by Zhenbin Li and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-li-apn-problem-statement-usecases Revision: 04 Title: Problem Statement and Use Cases of Application-aware Networking (APN) Document date: 2021-06-17 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 16 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-li-apn-problem-statement-usecases-04.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-apn-problem-statement-usecases/ Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-apn-problem-statement-usecases Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-li-apn-problem-statement-usecases-04 Abstract: Network operators are facing the challenge of providing better network services for users. As the ever-developing 5G and industrial verticals evolve, more and more services that have diverse network requirements such as ultra-low latency and high reliability are emerging, and therefore differentiated service treatment is desired by users. On the other hand, as network technologies such as Hierarchical QoS (H-QoS), SR Policy, and Network Slicing keep evolving, the network has the capability to provide more fine- granularity differentiated services. However, network operators are typically unware of the applications that are traversing their network infrastructure, which means that not very effective differentiated service treatment can be provided to the traffic flows. As network technologies evolve including deployments of IPv6, SRv6, Segment Routing over MPLS dataplane, the programmability provided by IPv6 and Segment Routing can be augmented by conveying application related information into the network satifying the fine- granularity requirements. This document analyzes the existing problems caused by lack of service awareness, and outlines various use cases that could benefit from an Application-aware Networking (APN) framework. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
