+1 On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Robert Walker <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> Sergey Ezhov wrote in post #1057962: > > Compare, for example, with a site www.php.net and you will see a big > > difference. > > > > I use both PHP and Ruby therefore I know about what I tell. > > Yes Rails documentation could be better. However, it is completely > unfair to compare programming language documentation to object > library/framework documentation. > > Programming languages, like PHP and Ruby, are easy to document. > Languages are MUCH smaller in scope than frameworks. If every method, of > every class, were fully documented by the team building Rails then > nothing would ever get done. > > Also of note is that PHP has been around a lot longer, and changes at a > much slower pace than Rails. > > Rails documentation is open for anyone to contribute. Complaining about > it is useless and certainly won't make the documentation better. Someone > caring enough to write documentation is what's going to make the > documentation better. > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.