My personal experience, of course, but the only time I'll ever write Cucumber features is if plain-english acceptance tests are a requirement. Otherwise (95% of the time), I'm quite happy with the RSpec/Capybara combo. The overhead of having to wire together plain-english to regular expressions just doesn't pay off in the end for normal acceptance testing.
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:29:04 PM UTC-5, Jason Hsu, Android developer wrote: > > So far, I've been using RSpec for testing my Rails apps simply because > that's what railstutorial.org emphasizes. > > However, I am in the process of trying out Cucumber. I like the fact that > it's in plain English, and this is an asset for communicating with clients > or other people who aren't Rubyists. Migrating to Cucumber sounds like a > good idea. > > I'm curious about what you prefer. Do any of you know Cucumber well, yet > still prefer RSpec? If so, why? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/9c7a0f68-1361-4503-bbdd-6f8cfdd2a6f7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
