Well it would be paginated, only X at a time will be grabbed for each page — 1-25, 26-50, 51-75, or something. Wont make much difference at a million rows than when you had only a handful! :)
Good luck! :) On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Dave Amos <rails-mailing-l...@andreas-s.net> wrote: > > Ashley Williams wrote: >> Its defiantly possible, though I'm not that good with rails yet, so >> I'm not sure exactly how you add conditions on other tables. But I >> don't think the performance would be that bad, it'd only have to span >> a few tables, which isn't that bad considering an average profile page >> would do the same; plus it can be cached a lot too. >> >> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Dave Amos > > Yeah, good point. If the table got crazy huge, I could start cutting off > really old entries to minimize the calculations. > > Thanks so much for the the help! I've already got a little feed that > shows you your recent activity, and I think it's trivial to create feeds > for all activity your friends have taken and all activity on recipes you > created. This is exciting! :) > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
