Spawn is dead easy (http://rubyforge.org/projects/spawn/). I used it to great effect for sending emails while making the user think they where all already sent. The others Frederick suggested work but are more trouble than starling/workling.
Harm On Feb 23, 12:14 pm, Frederick Cheung <frederick.che...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23 Feb 2009, at 10:38, Ankit Parekh wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all > > > I am working on a heavy engineering project. And the requirement is > > that > > I needto do a lot of process before I store the data to the db. > > > Now the question is that I want to do the process that I am doing > > but I > > want to do it in the background. What I actually mean to say is > > that..I > > just want the user to get a msg that Records Saved. But in real I want > > the process to go on in background. > > > There r multiple callbacks used in my system. Also I dont want to use > > Starling or workling. pls suggest something where in my requirement is > > satisfied. Since i dont want the user to wait until my process is > > going > > on. > > Well one of the other background processors (bj, backgroundrb etc. ) > might do the job > > Fred > > > thanks > > -- > > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
