On Jan 27, 2011, at 8:28 PM, bob wrote:

> It seems to me like you ought to be able to call .to_yaml on a
> activerecord object and then use YAML.load to reconstitute it.
> 
> I'm trying to figure out if something is wrong with my ruby / rails
> installation or if this is something that everyone experiences.
> 
> Can anyone else verify that after creating a simple new rails project
> and model, an instance of the model cannot make a round trip to_yaml
> and back?

Confirmed.  Rails 3.0.3.  Same error you get.


> 
> 
> On Jan 27, 9:11 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
>> Frederick Cheung wrote in post #978021:
>> [...]
>> 
>>> I seem to recall that
>>> historically, although method_missing etc was overriden to add dynamic
>>> methods, respond_to wasn't, which didn't make AR a very good citizen,
>>> which may be why this works with projects using old versions of rails
>> 
>> How is that possible?  respond_to? shouldn't need to be overridden to
>> take method_missing into account, should it?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Fred
>> 
>> Best,
>> -- 
>> Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org
>> mar...@marnen.org
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> --
>> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to