Hey - I need your input regarding a problem I've come across. I'll first
explain what the problem is, and what I think the solution is. If I
misunderstood how things work, please let me know.

# The problem

I'm using Dragonfly (on-the-fly file processing) to serve images. Dragonfly
uses Rack::Cache to cache the processed images so subsequent requests are
served by Rack::Cache. The problem lies in Rack::Cache getting too busy
serving images. I thought the fix would be to let Rack::Cache use Apache's
X-Sendfile to serve images.  You can read my journey in a StackOverflow
question I posted <http://stackoverflow.com/q/7980106/61018>.

# The solution

The solution would be to enable whatever's needed to get Rack::Cache to
serve files using X-Sendfile through Rack::Sendfile. After poking around
Rack::Cache, I found out that none of the Rack::Cache Entitystores are used
-- what's being used is Rails' own storage
solution<https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/3-1-stable/activesupport/lib/active_support/cache/file_store.rb>
.

Is there a reason that FileStore doesn't support Rack::Sendfile at the
moment (why it uses Marshal)? What would be the easiest way to get to what
I need? Can I just tell Rails to use Rack::Cache's Disk entitystore? If
not, what do you guys think of letting the *body* of the *response* of *
FileStore* (yes, a bit of a mouthful) to respond to `to_path`?

Thanks!
Ramon Tayag

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to