On 13 December 2011 17:56, John Doe <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote: > I appreciate the answers, but, why is everyone asking about my business > case for IIS?
Because you're telling us about a problem you have, and we're asking you to back-up a little... > Suffice it to say that I am bound by corporate policy which is now > committed to Microsoft technology. Well, then you won't be using Rails, as it's not MS technology, and you would be breaching your corporate policy if you did. Alternatively, if you can meet your "policy" by using Windows servers, but other software (like Apache, or even a *nix VM running on a Windows-based hypervisor...) then Rails may be an option. > over merits of Apache versus IIS but corporate policy perceives Apache > as a quirky open source thing that poses a security risk. As opposed to quirky closed source things that pose security risks?! Sounds like you have a management-education problem ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
