> For the record: the category/free_module refactorization allowed to > get rid of about 200 lines out of 700. Those were mostly lines of > code; I kept all the doctests. Now that you have seen how this works, > how would you feel doing something similar for WeylCharacters?
I agree that it should be done. I'm not sure when I'll have time to do it though. Note that there are not one but two related rings defined in weyl_characters.py, the WeylCharacterRing and the related WeightRing. > sage.algebras.iwahori (as it currently is) > sage.combinat.iwahori (similar to sage.combinat.sf / ...) > sage.combinat.root_system.iwahori (similar to sage.combinat.weyl_group) I debated where to put it. All three places seem logical. Along the same lines, why is coxeter_groups.py in categories? Dan
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-de...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
