On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 01:46:24PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Yes, indeed. When using the tensor product as I now implemented it,
> this is basically what appear except with a tensor sign. Perhaps
> this suffices?

This seems a good compromise indeed. And this can easily be later
improved if deemed essential by users (say for compactness, ...).

Cheers,
                                Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. ThiƩry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to