On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 01:46:24PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: > Yes, indeed. When using the tensor product as I now implemented it, > this is basically what appear except with a tensor sign. Perhaps > this suffices?
This seems a good compromise indeed. And this can easily be later improved if deemed essential by users (say for compactness, ...). Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas M. ThiƩry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net> http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.