On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:35:18PM -0700, Simon King wrote:
> On 27 Mrz., 08:11, Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote:
> > I guess, what I should do is to test at the beginning of the
> > groebner_basis method whether we have a field, and give a clear error
> > message. Also I should mention that restriction in the doc string of
> > the groebner_basis method.
>
>
> Udate done. But no rebasing, yet.
I have rebased it in the sage-combinat queue. I have left it guarded
out though, because it requires a lot of recompilation (change to
ring.pxd), which is annoying in the queue. Anyone who wants to play
with it can just remove the guard in his own series file.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
