On 2/17/12 12:13 AM, Florent Hivert wrote: >>> By the way: changing P.linear_extensions() to return an enumerated set >>> rather than a plain list could make sense, assuming there is no speed >>> loss. This might require a bit of cythonification; maybe using >>> ClonableArray will be enough. It's slightly backward incompatible (it >>> does not print the same). >> >> Why did you make the choice to print differently in ClonableArray as opposed >> to CombinatorialObject? > > What is the difference ? > > sage: CombinatorialObject([1,2,3]) > [1, 2, 3] > > sage: class toto(ClonableIntArray): > ....: def check(self): pass > sage: toto(Parent(), [1,2,3]) > [1, 2, 3]
I do not know. Nicolas mentioned that it was different and not backward compatible. Cheers, Anne -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
