I'm not sure that everyone was getting the same conflict as I was and I am not sure why. I just disabled your patch and I will fold it into mine later.
I think that I also fixed the NCSF conflict that was also happening between my patch and Chris'. -Mike On Friday, 1 June 2012 09:07:04 UTC-4, Martin wrote: > > Mike Zabrocki writes: > > > Hi all, > > > > I've been working on a major revamp of symmetric functions. It is > > possible that the changes I have been making conflict with Martin's > > recent changes to the `principle specialization` and have broken the > > queue. > > Sorry for that. Should I revert? Alternatively: why don't you just > copy the specializations into your patch and we delete mine (no idea how > to do that, I admit) > > Martin > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/msBrSuDdrVgJ. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
