On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:05:39PM +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
> I think that "in the complete basis" is somewhat strange to read.
>
> How about
>
> sage: Sym.p()
> Sym; basis: powersum
> sage: Sym.m()
> Sym; basis: monomial
> sage: Sym.e()
> Sym; basis: elementary
> sage: Sym.h() # should this complete?
> Sym; basis: complete
> sage: Sym.s() # Mind the capital here
> Sym; basis: Schur
> sage: Sym.f()
> Sym; basis: forgotten
In MuPAD-Combinat we were even more compact: ``Sym.p()`` was shown as
``Sym.p`` :-) but that's not so much in line where Sage's usage is for
naming things using natural language.
Ok, everybody, please vote!
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
