Hi Franco, Chris,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:11:16AM +0200, Florent Hivert wrote:
> On Sage 5.2:
>
> popcorn-*el/sage-combinat $ sage -combinat qselect
> ...
> application de trac_11929_8899-ncsf-qsym-fs-5.2.patch
> skipping trac_11929_8899-ncsf-qsym-final.patch - guarded by '-5_3_beta2'
> skipping trac_11929_8899-ncsf-qsym-repr-fix-fs.patch - guarded by '-5_3_beta2'
> application de trac_13404-sf-nt.3.patch
> patching file sage/combinat/ncsf_qsym/ncsf.py
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 492
> ...
The final ncsf patches seem to apply smoothly on 5.2. Is there any
reason not to use them instead of trac_11929_8899-ncsf-qsym-fs-5.2.patch?
Then trac_13404-sf-nt.3.patch would apply smoothly without doing
something specific for 5.2.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
