Please keep reporting them. It should be the case that these tests
pass on the first run.

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:14 PM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  2008/4/21 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> >
>  >  On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  >  mabshoff wrote:
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > Hello folks,
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > here goes Sage 3.0.rc1. We are down to one blocker, i.e. the "-O0"
>  >  >  > fallback for clips in case of failure. Other than that this release
>  >  >  > should build and test fine. The 3.0 release is imminent, so if you
>  >  >  > find anything you better be quick. The plan is to follow up the 3.0
>  >  >  > release with one or two bug fix releases, i.e. 3.0.1 and 3.0.2. The
>  >  >  > timing of those releases will depend on the coercion rewrite.
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > Sources and binaries are in the usual place:
>  >  >
>  >  >  On Fedora 7, 32 bits:
>  >  >
>  >  >  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >  The following tests failed:
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >          sage -t  devel/sage/sage/server/simple/twist.py
>  >  >  Total time for all tests: 4315.7 seconds
>  >  >  Please see /home/jaap/downloads/sage-3.0.rc1/tmp/test.log for the 
> complete log from this test.
>  >  >
>  >  >  But:
>  >  >
>  >  >  [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-3.0.rc1]$ ./sage -t  
> devel/sage/sage/server/simple/twist.py
>  >  >  sage -t  devel/sage/sage/server/simple/twist.py
>  >  >           [9.9 s]
>  >  >
>  >  >  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >  All tests passed!
>  >  >  Total time for all tests: 10.0 seconds
>  >  >  [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-3.0.rc1]$
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >  Jaap
>  >
>  >  Hi Jaap and John,
>  >
>  >  Both of the failures you guys report -- in twist.py and testdoc.py involve
>  >  opening a network port, doing some tests that things are working,
>  >  then closing it. I think closing just takes a while with ports, perhaps,
>  >  and that might be relevant.    I think if we make the ports in the tests
>  >  more spread out that could help.
>  >
>
>  That makes sense.  Would it be better not to report such test failures
>  which pass on a second try?
>
>  John
>
>
>
>  >   -- William
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  >
>  >
>
>  >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to