> I tried plasTex on 3-4 separate occasions. I so wish it actually worked. > It only works on trivial examples, and falls apart on anything nontrivial > at all, in all my experience. latex2html is vastly more robust than that. > I wish this weren't the case. > > William
William challenged me to try to build my most recent research paper with plastex: - first, it choked on the listings package (which is a bummer) - second, it didn't like line breaks in $ $ (I don't know those are valid LaTeX) - then it worked: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/malb/plastex-algebraicdifferentialcryptanalysis Next stop: Sage Reference manual. It didn't find the custom macros and a bunch of packages but it kinda worked: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/malb/plastex-sage-ref and it looks prettier than latex2html IMHO but it would need a fair amount of work since some stuff is getting mixed up. Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
