Some weird behavior in ComplexIntervalField: CIF(0) != CIF(-1, 1);
This should be false (as the value 0 is contained in both intervals), but it returns true (using whatever version is on sagenb.org). A little deeper: print CIF(0); 0 print CIF(1); [1.00000000000000000000 .. 1.00000000000000000000] So it seems the problem is in the construction of ComplexIntervalField from an integer. Note that it works fine for RIF, in particular print RIF(0); [0.00000000000000000 .. 0.00000000000000000] A fix for this would be greatly appreciated. Also has anyone decided the appropriate way to go about fixing the 'x in x.parent()' bug (for x RealIntervalFieldElement or ComplexIntervalFieldElement)? Thanks, Eric --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
