Hmm I asked the same question a while ago. Seems it wasn't noticed then:) http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/3ab2e924e5d887f7/ddeae645aced582f?lnk=gst&q=michel#ddeae645aced582f
Regards, Michel On Nov 22, 1:01 pm, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ring R=(0,a,b),(x,y),dp; > > > > (following the syntax 2. given > > > athttp://www.singular.uni-kl.de/Manual/latest/sing_30.htm#SEC40) > > > > In particular, Gröbner basis can be computed by Singular in these > > > polynomial rings more efficiently than the toy algorithm currently > > > used. > > This sounds very much likehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/687 > > - but I think malb should comment. > > No, it is something different. I completely agree with Guillaume on this. > Guillaume, want to go ahead and improve the Singular interface? I can help > you out in case you get stuck. This is now > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4582 > > but unfortunately I won't have time to work on this in the near future. Btw. > once the conversion via pexpect is done, we should move the multivariate > polynomials over the fraction fields over to libsingular too (but that > requires a bit more insight into how Sage and Singular work). > > Cheers, > Martin > > -- > name: Martin Albrecht > _pgp:http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 > _www:http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb > _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
