On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Blair <blai...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I thought the complete windows port should be available via SCM.
Yes of course that will be a shortterm goal. Otherwise collaboration is difficult. > I find working on downloaded source snapshots a bit too cumbersome. > > Is there an advantage of using HG/Mercurial over SVN. Speed perhaps? > On Windows, TortoiseSVN is very popular among many open source > projects because of its tight integration with the desktop. > > On Feb 23, 3:52 pm, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Feb 23, 6:26 am, Blair <blai...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> > I will help with the Windows port. >> >> > Is it feasible to have the source code in SVN? >> >> Which source code specifically do you mean? >> >> If things get checked in it won't be SVN, but HG. *Anything* but CVS >> or SVN :) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Michael > > > -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
