> Is there a reason that you don't convert to C graphs by default anymore? > I can see this preventing at least some people from getting fast > answers and having a bad opinion of Sage :(.
If there were evidence that things were *always* faster when converting to C graphs automatically, I would definitely want to implement that. What I was afraid of were the cases that would terminate quickly in the isomorph stage, and hence copying the graph over would be a waste of time. Granted, isomorph testing itself can probably be expected to dominate, so I wouldn't be surprised if converting first was just about always faster. Thoughts? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
