On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:55 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just out of curiosity, do you think we should also get rid of this? > > sage: R.<x> = ZZ[] > sage: x(x+1) > x + 1
Ouch, that's a tougher question, since I actually use that construct :) But since I don't want to be a total hypocrite, I'm going to say yes, we should get rid of it. (With a deprecation message -- eventually to be replaced by an error message -- that gives the recommended replacement.) So, should I prepare patches that deprecate implicit calling of symbolics and of polynomials? (Would they be likely to be accepted?) Carl --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
