On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Maurizio <maurizio.gran...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't get it... > > how should this make SAGE easier? From my point of view, I don't even > remember anymore (my bad I know) what a ring represent, but this is > not slowing down my SAGE learning, I think. > > But what if tomorrow or the day after, I do need those? > > I'm sorry, I just don't get the point of removing stuff for engineers, > how could this help them (I should say, us)? I think good examples and > documentation would be SO MUCH better to have!
As a non-mathematician and a computer science undergraduate, I strongly agree with this. I've been meaning to update and improve the guide "Numerical Computing with Sage" http://www.sagemath.org/doc/numerical_sage/ which is distributed as part of the standard Sage documentation. However, time doesn't permit. Any volunteers? I'd be more than happy to review. -- Regards Minh Van Nguyen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
