Minh Nguyen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Maurizio <maurizio.gran...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I don't get it... >> >> how should this make SAGE easier? From my point of view, I don't even >> remember anymore (my bad I know) what a ring represent, but this is >> not slowing down my SAGE learning, I think. >> >> But what if tomorrow or the day after, I do need those? >> >> I'm sorry, I just don't get the point of removing stuff for engineers, >> how could this help them (I should say, us)? I think good examples and >> documentation would be SO MUCH better to have! > > As a non-mathematician and a computer science undergraduate, I > strongly agree with this. I've been meaning to update and improve the > guide "Numerical Computing with Sage" > > http://www.sagemath.org/doc/numerical_sage/ > > which is distributed as part of the standard Sage documentation. > However, time doesn't permit. Any volunteers? I'd be more than happy > to review. >
(not volunteering, but....) To help someone that would like to update it, can you give a short list of changes/additions you would make? If someone had an outline of changes to make, it would probably make it easier to get started on it. Thanks, Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
