On Mar 31, 10:49 am, Franco Saliola <sali...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd rather it were named the more verbose, but significantly more > > explicit, FormalPowerSeriesRing. This fits better with the naming of > > all the other rings, and we do have tab completion after all. > > I prefer FormalPowerSeriesRing, as well.
I have no real problem with naming it that way, actually I called it that way in my previous version. I have however negative rememberance when developing Java: that a whole line was filled with just two type names. So if there are no other votes for names, I rollback the name to "FormalPowerSeriesRing". --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
