Excellent! I had hoped you would like it. It would probably be
pointless if you weren't on board.

Bill.

On 12 Apr, 09:26, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> 
> wrote:
>
> > I think JSage has a slightly different focus. Specifically:
>
> > * It is tied to the Sage Python library
> > * It is intended for people who have a complementary publication in a
> > traditional journal
> > * The code has to be included in Sage and be maintained there
> > * The board of editors consists of Sage developers
>
> > What I have in mind is different:
>
> > * Not tied to implementations in Sage, but implementations accessible
> > from the Sage Notebook
> > * It would *be* a traditional journal (except that it is only
> > available online) - no need for a separate written paper
> > * The code could be in python, C or assembler, etc., in Sage, in
> > Macaulay, Gap or Magma, etc. - the only requirement is it is
> > accessible from the Sage Notebook
> > * The board of editors would be distinguished mathematicians, not
> > necessarily Sage developers (eventually there would be lots of people
> > who are both)
> > * The code examples, algorithm implementations need not run forever
> > and a day in the latest Sage - they would be tied to a certain
> > historical binary, e.g. Gap version x.y.z and Sage version k.l.m
>
> > And I would be interested in:
>
> > * Teaching expositions
> > * Survey papers
> > * Implementations of new algorithms
> > * Theoretical papers (where some significant portion of it relies on
> > computations which need verification or where computational examples
> > are given to illustrate it)
>
> > Both JSage and SagePapers could exist. I personally am not interested
> > in JSage the way it is currently set up. It's an extremely valuable
> > thing to have, just not any use to me personally.
>
> I don't think anybody is really interested in jsage the way it is
> currently set up.  It hasn't gone anywhere.   I like your idea since
> it seems more viable.
>
> William
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to