On Apr 12, 8:47 am, John H Palmieri <jhpalmier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 11, 6:34 pm, Rob Beezer <goo...@beezer.cotse.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 11, 5:59 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > You could post your file.
>
> > Its at http://buzzard.ups.edu/private/latex.py
>
> > This is the fubared version of sage/misc/latex.py (which I am in the
> > middle of working on). It contains one doctest that I've edited
> > heavily, so some changes seem to be allowed OK. I'm running sage -t
> > on it within my development tree, which has been upgraded progessively
> > to 3.4.1.rc2.
>
> > When I take out the docstring on the first function, it passes all
> > tests.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Rob
>
> I've had similar problems with this same file: making seemingly
> innocuous changes near the top screws up the doctests for
> latex_variable_name at the bottom, acting like EMBEDDED_MODE is True.
> Are those the doctests which fail for you? I couldn't figure out why,
> though.
Also, I'll confirm that if you take 3.4.1.rc2, then in latex.py,
adding a docstring to have_png -- just something trivial, as Rob says,
like
"""
docstring
docstring
"""
then doctests suddenly fail for that file.
John
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
