On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:32 AM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:20 AM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote: >>> > >>> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> I made an "Elementary Number Theory" quickref, which I've posted here: >>> >> >>> >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/quickref >>> > >>> > All those quickrefs look good. It's a nice idea. >>> > >>> > Ondrej >>> >>> Somebody should make one for sympy :-) >>> >>> And another for numpy. >>> >>> Another for scipy. >>> >>> Maybe someone should make one about "finite element methods" using Python. >> >> I agree, but SPD is much higher priority for me now: > > Then make a quickref for SPD :-) > >> http://code.google.com/p/spdproject/ >> >> and disentangling the sage notebook, so that it can be shipped without any >> sage dependencies. > > How is that going? I'm now very interested in that, since > sage-windows can't go any > further really without doing that too.
Unfortunately bad, I need to do my school now. But the latest status is here: http://code.google.com/p/spdproject/issues/detail?id=4 if anyone could finish it, it'd be awesome. > >> Then one can trivially use any python library (be it >> numpy, scipy or sympy or anything else) on any computer and also over the >> web, and also create all in all packages easily. I think that's what needed >> now. > > + full windows support :-) > > windows.sagemath.org Yes, this is also extremely important. On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:32 AM, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 13, 11:25 am, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:20 AM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > <SNIP> > >> > Maybe someone should make one about "finite element methods" using Python. >> >> I agree, but SPD is much higher priority for me now: >> >> http://code.google.com/p/spdproject/ >> >> and disentangling the sage notebook, so that it can be shipped without any >> sage dependencies. Then one can trivially use any python library (be it >> numpy, scipy or sympy or anything else) on any computer and also over the >> web, and also create all in all packages easily. I think that's what needed >> now. > > Yeah, I have been thinking about how to make Sage and SPD play > together nicely, i.e. at the moment all env variables in Sage are SAGE_ > $FOO while for SPD they ought to be SPD_$FOO. Getting this somehow > resolved would be nice. Yes, I am aware of this. I can imagine people taking Sage and doing other custom distributions, e.g. wanting to have their names too. But as to me, I don't mind using SAGE_, as long as the main binary is called differently. > > By the way: SPD in Germany is the social party, so it does sound funny > to my ears :) I am aware of this too -- I was really thinking should I name it that way or not, given my political preferences (way to the rigth of the german spd), but then decided, yes, I am not German, I don't live in Germany, Source Python Distribution is a good name, so be it. :) > > Another thing is that currently the dependencies for Sage are > hardcoded in deps. It would be much nicer if somehow each spkg could > provide some info that could be assembled in deps dynamically. That > way you should be able to assemble some project via SPD by just > providing a list of "key" packages and the rest would be put together > automatically. I don't have any concrete plans to work on this, but > maybe somebody else feels inspired :) Yes, I was thinking about this too. I think what William just suggested could do it. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
