On Apr 15, 3:17 pm, Brian Granger <ellisonbg....@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
> I agree that this is really great, but isn't the name a bit confusing?
> Why not sagenotebook?
It is slightly more than the Sage notebook, hence sage-lite. The name
has "historical" reasons and in the end I think we should have a sage-
notebook.spkg once things are cleaned up a little more.
> Brian
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > William and Mike has created the sagelite, which is just the Sage
> > notebook, without any other Sage dependencies.
>
> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5789
>
> > The patch is +1 from me, but could someone more familiar with the Sage
> > code also give it a review please? It touches quite a lot of things,
> > so that we can be more sure it doesn't break anything.
The patch was completely broken, i.e. did not compile. Mike fixed that
after I pointed that out, but there is still one rather bizarre
doctest failure and some other things that need fixing. I did not look
at the code in any extend, but I expect this to be reviewed and merged
in 3.4.1.rc3 tonight since that patch is rather brittle and would
bitrot quickly.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
