In the Wikipedia entry for sage, one of the tags has been added by someone:
"This article's section called "Description" does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. (April 2009)" I can see that in particular, the bit which says: "A free distribution of the world's most widely used open source mathematical software that builds easily from source." could (even should) be challenged. Is there any reference which can show that? If one looks at the Mathematica entry, it's clear that 'JonMcLoone' (who is employed by Wolfram Research), spends a *lot* of time tidying the article up - removing any negative comments! But the Mathematica entry does look a lot better than the Sage one. The Mathematica entry cites 40 references - the sage one only 4. I've updated the history a bit, from HISTORY.txt. Adding more history entries, and what features were added, would no doubt give the impression the project is more active than what it appears from the Wikipedia entry. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
