Built fine and passed all tests on 64-bit Ubuntu.
Built fine, 2 test failyres on 32-bit Suse: the singular.pyx issue
already reported, and
**********************************************************************
File
"/local/jec/sage-4.0.2.rc0/devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx",
line 2092:
sage: [L(6).valuation(P) for P in L.primes_above(6)]
Expected:
[2, 2, 4]
Got:
[4, 2, 2]
**********************************************************************
That is on old issue: L.primes_above(6) tries to sort the primes but
there are tie-break situations where the order is not determined; and
pari's output is often different on 32-or 64-bit machines. Unless
someone can come up with a reliable way of sorting primes in a number
field (currently "sorted by residue degree first, then by
underlying prime (or equivalently, by norm).") this doctest
should be changed so as not to depend on the order.
John
2009/6/15 William Stein <wst...@gmail.com>:
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Martin
> Albrecht<m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Monday 15 June 2009, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Martin
>>>
>>> Albrecht<m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de> wrote:
>>> >> sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular.pyx"
>>> >> **********************************************************************
>>> >> File
>>> >> "/Users/was/build/sage-4.0.2.rc0/devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular.
>>> >>pyx ", line 501:
>>> >> sage: P(2^32-1)
>>> >> Expected:
>>> >> -1
>>> >> Got:
>>> >> 4294967295
>>> >
>>> > Is that with my the fix at
>>> >
>>> > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/6051/singular_exp_o
>>> >verflow.patch
>>> >
>>> > or without? It seems (since you are using a 32-bit system) all that needs
>>> > to be done is to fix the doctest.
>>>
>>> No, I had not applied your patch. However, I just did, and the above
>>> issue remains.
>>
>> Yes, the issue remains. One should change the doctest, i.e. the behaviour we
>> expect now is the wrong behaviour.
>
> This is now
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6300
>
> a blocker for sage-4.0.2.
>
> William
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
