Dear Tom, dear category reviewers,
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 02:30:23PM -0700, Nicolas Thiéry wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:00:19PM -0700, Tom Boothby wrote:
> > I'm the release manager for sage-4.0.3.
> > Python to 2.6, and if I succeed, I'll rename the release to sage-4.1.
> > In about an hour, I'm going to send out review requests.
>
> Tom: thanks very much for your time on this!
>
> To all (potential) category code reviewers: I would really want to see
> the category code end up in 4.1. FPSAC, the main algebraic
> combinatorics conference, is less than one month from now, and the
> sage-combinat dev have invested a lot of work this year to get Sage up
> to speed at this point. We have 1/2 Mb worth of combinatorics patches
> (root systems, crystals, symmetric functions, ...) waiting for the
> category code to get in. For those, we will be able to manage the
> review process among us, but we will need some time.
Does the following looks sensible to all of you:
- By, say, Wednesday, each category reviewer makes sure to glance
through his patch, and report whether he sees any definitive show
stopper: that is something that absolutely have to be fixed before
integrating the code into Sage, and that is not easy to fix. He
also report an estimate of the date by which he can complete the
full review.
- Accordingly, it's decided whether the category code is the official
goal (with python 2.6) for Sage 4.1. And whether there should be an
intermediate 4.0.3.
- If yes (which I very much hope!), we all work hard to tidy up the
easy things to fix.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
