On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:37 AM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Minh Nguyen <nguyenmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Ticket #6580 [1] is meant to have ratpoints build with GCC 3.4.x. The
>> Sage build farm uses GCC >= 4.0.1 and ticket #7021 [2] has the updated
>> package prereq-0.4 which checks that the target platform has GCC >=
>> 4.0.1. With the updated prereq-0.4 spkg, it invalidates the GCC 3.4.x
>> requirement of ratpoints. Do we really need/want to support GCC 3.4.x?
>>
>
> Just to summarize some arguments...
>
> AGAINST supporting GCC 3.4.x:
>
>  [ ] it increases the work by Minh and I
>  [ ] we do not have any computers with gcc 3.4 right now, so would
> have to install gcc 3.4 on them.
>  [ ] we rarely get requests from people who want to build sage with
> 3.4 (it happened once in the last two months)
>  [ ] the new configure script that David Kirkby wrote requires gcc 4.x
>  [ ] Robert Miller broke 3.4 support by introducing the ratpoints
> spkg in May, and it seems nobody has been motivated to do anything
> about this.
>
> FOR supporting 3.4.x:
>
>  [ ] It probably would be easy at this point, since it just means
> fixing ratpoints.
>
>  [ ] This reminds me of when we dumped support for Cygwin in 2007.
> In retrospect allowing that was a big mistake which I regret, because
> it has made getting support for Cygwin back vastly more difficult (in
> fact, so far impossible, since nobody has done it).
>
Has anyone tried to build for interix instead of cygwin?
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#x-x-interix


>  [ ] There is a general principal that compiling code on a wider
> range of compilers is generally a good thing.
>
>  [ ] Some users have non-admin access only on boxes that only have
> pre 4.x gcc's.
>
>  -- William
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to